Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
XPG MARS 980 PRO — PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #12
XPG

XPG MARS 980 PRO

PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #12

84
/ 100
From $200
VS
Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare wins by 2
Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare — PCIe 4.0 · 7000/5100 MB/s · 4TB
Samsung

Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare

PCIe 4.0 · 7000/5100 MB/s · 4TB

86
/ 100
From $360
Specdex verdict

Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, XPG MARS 980 PRO lands at 84 and Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare at 86. That puts Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick XPG MARS 980 PRO if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (89,200) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput

Pick Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

XPG MARS 980 PRO

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

XPG MARS 980 PRO more score per dollar ($200 vs $360).

XPG MARS 980 PRO 84
vs
86 Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare

Score breakdown

XPG MARS 980 PRO
84
ssd 84
passmark_disk 89200
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare
86
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84

Specs side-by-side

XPG MARS 980 PRO versus Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare — full spec comparison
Spec XPG MARS 980 PRO Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare
PassMark Disk Score
89,200
PassMark rank
#12 of 100 consumer SSDs
Interface
PCIe 4.0
Capacity
4TB
Read/Write
7000/5100 MB/s

XPG MARS 980 PRO

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (89,200) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

FAQ: XPG MARS 980 PRO vs Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare

Which is better, XPG MARS 980 PRO or Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare? +

Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is XPG MARS 980 PRO worth the price? +

At $200, XPG MARS 980 PRO delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Is Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare worth the price? +

At $360, Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Does XPG MARS 980 PRO or Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, XPG MARS 980 PRO or Samsung 980 Pro 4TB · bare? +

XPG MARS 980 PRO — more score per dollar ($200 vs $360). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.