Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Xeon W9-3495X — Sapphire Rapids · 56C/112T · LGA4677
Intel

Xeon W9-3495X

Sapphire Rapids · 56C/112T · LGA4677

92
/ 100
From $5,889
VS
Apple M5 Pro wins by 4
Apple M5 Pro — 14C CPU · 20C GPU · 300 GB/s
Apple

Apple M5 Pro

14C CPU · 20C GPU · 300 GB/s

96
/ 100
From $2,199
Specdex verdict

Apple M5 Pro takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Xeon W9-3495X lands at 92 and Apple M5 Pro at 96. That puts Apple M5 Pro ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Xeon W9-3495X if…

  • Massive core counts
  • ECC memory support
  • Workstation/server-grade platform

Pick Apple M5 Pro if…

  • Creator-tier silicon in a laptop
  • Improved memory bandwidth over M4 Pro
  • Excellent media engines
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Apple M5 Pro

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Apple M5 Pro leads on gaming (82 vs 72).

Creators & productivity

Apple M5 Pro

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Apple M5 Pro leads on multi (94 vs 92).

Power efficiency

Apple M5 Pro

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Apple M5 Pro leads on efficiency (98 vs 78).

Value for money

Apple M5 Pro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Apple M5 Pro more score per dollar ($2,199 vs $5,889).

Xeon W9-3495X 92
vs
96 Apple M5 Pro

Score breakdown

Xeon W9-3495X
92
single 84
multi 92
gaming 72
efficiency 78
Apple M5 Pro
96
single 99
multi 94
gaming 82
efficiency 98

Specs side-by-side

Xeon W9-3495X versus Apple M5 Pro — full spec comparison
Spec Xeon W9-3495X Apple M5 Pro
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Cores
56
14 (10P+4E)
Threads
112
Socket
LGA4677
Release year
2023
GPU cores
20
Memory bandwidth
300 GB/s
Neural engine
16-core, 55 TOPS

Xeon W9-3495X

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • High TDP requires serious cooling
  • Premium price

Apple M5 Pro

Pros
  • +Creator-tier silicon in a laptop
  • +Improved memory bandwidth over M4 Pro
  • +Excellent media engines
Cons
  • Only in MacBook Pro / Mac mini
  • Premium pricing
  • Windows ARM gap persists

FAQ: Xeon W9-3495X vs Apple M5 Pro

Which is better, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M5 Pro? +

Apple M5 Pro scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Xeon W9-3495X worth the price? +

At $5,889, Xeon W9-3495X delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in multi.

Is Apple M5 Pro worth the price? +

At $2,199, Apple M5 Pro delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in single.

Does Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M5 Pro last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M5 Pro? +

Apple M5 Pro — leads on gaming (82 vs 72). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Xeon W9-3495X or Apple M5 Pro? +

Apple M5 Pro — leads on multi (94 vs 92). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.