Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — 4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE
UGREEN

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE

86
/ 100
From $499
VS
Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 wins by 3
Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 — All-flash · 12× M.2 NVMe · 10 GbE
Asustor

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2

All-flash · 12× M.2 NVMe · 10 GbE

89
/ 100
From $1,599
Specdex verdict

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 lands at 86 and Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 at 89. That puts Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick UGREEN NASync DXP4800 if…

  • ✓10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • ✓Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • ✓NVMe cache x2

Pick Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 if…

  • ✓12× M.2 NVMe slots
  • ✓10 GbE built-in
  • ✓Silent — no spinning drives
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Software

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2

Compared on the software sub-score

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 leads on software (80 vs 76).

Value for money

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 more score per dollar ($499 vs $1,599).

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 86
vs
89 Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2

Score breakdown

UGREEN NASync DXP4800
86
performance 92
features 90
software 76
value 94
hardware 0
ease 0
Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2
89
performance 0
features 0
software 80
value 86
hardware 96
ease 84

Specs side-by-side

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 versus Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 — full spec comparison
Spec UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2
Bays
4
12× M.2 NVMe Gen 4
CPU
Intel N100
▲ Intel Atom x7835RE (8 cores)
RAM
8 GB DDR5
▲ 16 GB DDR5 (expandable to 64)
Ports
2× 2.5 GbE + 1× 10 GbE
—
Network
—
10 GbE × 1 + 2.5 GbE × 2
USB
—
4× USB 3.2 Gen 2

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Pros
  • +10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • +Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • +NVMe cache x2
Cons
  • −UGOS still maturing
  • −No mature app store vs DSM
  • −Warranty support is new

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2

Pros
  • +12× M.2 NVMe slots
  • +10 GbE built-in
  • +Silent — no spinning drives
Cons
  • −NVMe TB-per-dollar still pricey
  • −Heat management critical
  • −ADM software trails DSM polish

FAQ: UGREEN NASync DXP4800 vs Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2

Which is better, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 or Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2? +

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is UGREEN NASync DXP4800 worth the price? +

At $499, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in value.

Is Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 worth the price? +

At $1,599, Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in hardware.

Does UGREEN NASync DXP4800 or Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for software, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 or Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2? +

Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2 — leads on software (80 vs 76). Compared on the software sub-score.

Which is the better value, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 or Asustor Flashstor 12 Pro Gen2? +

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — more score per dollar ($499 vs $1,599). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.