Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Ubiquiti UDM-Pro — Wi-Fi 6 · —
Ubiquiti

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro

Wi-Fi 6 · —

90
/ 100
From $379
VS
Ubiquiti UDM-Pro wins by 3
GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) — Wi-Fi 6 · OpenWrt · 2.5 GbE × 5
GL.iNet

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Wi-Fi 6 · OpenWrt · 2.5 GbE × 5

87
/ 100
From $199
Specdex verdict

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Ubiquiti UDM-Pro lands at 90 and GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) at 87. That puts Ubiquiti UDM-Pro ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Ubiquiti UDM-Pro if…

  • ✓Current-gen Wi-Fi
  • ✓App-driven setup
  • ✓Parental controls (brand-dependent)

Pick GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) if…

  • ✓Native OpenWrt with GL.iNet polish
  • ✓5× 2.5 GbE ports
  • ✓Tailscale + WireGuard built-in
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Features

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Compared on the features sub-score

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) leads on features (96 vs 88).

Throughput

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro

Compared on the throughput sub-score

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro leads on throughput (90 vs 88).

Range

Tie

Compared on the range sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) more score per dollar ($199 vs $379).

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro 90
vs
87 GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Score breakdown

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro
90
throughput 90
range 86
features 88
value 82
ease 0
GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)
87
throughput 88
range 86
features 96
value 0
ease 84

Specs side-by-side

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro versus GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) — full spec comparison
Spec Ubiquiti UDM-Pro GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)
Standard
Wi-Fi 6
Wi-Fi 6 dual-band
Throughput
—
—
Total bandwidth
—
5400 Mbps
WAN
—
2.5 GbE
LAN
—
4× 2.5 GbE
USB
—
1× USB 3.0
Coverage
—
~3000 sq ft

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro

Pros
  • +Current-gen Wi-Fi
  • +App-driven setup
  • +Parental controls (brand-dependent)
Cons
  • −Advanced features sometimes subscription-gated
  • −Range varies
  • −Firmware stability improves over time

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Pros
  • +Native OpenWrt with GL.iNet polish
  • +5× 2.5 GbE ports
  • +Tailscale + WireGuard built-in
Cons
  • −Wi-Fi 6 (not 7) at this price
  • −Limited 6 GHz support
  • −Setup steeper than eero

FAQ: Ubiquiti UDM-Pro vs GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)

Which is better, Ubiquiti UDM-Pro or GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)? +

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro scores 90 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Ubiquiti UDM-Pro worth the price? +

At $379, Ubiquiti UDM-Pro delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in throughput.

Is GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) worth the price? +

At $199, GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in features.

Does Ubiquiti UDM-Pro or GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for features, Ubiquiti UDM-Pro or GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)? +

GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) — leads on features (96 vs 88). Compared on the features sub-score.

Which is better for throughput, Ubiquiti UDM-Pro or GL.iNet Flint 2 (GL-MT6000)? +

Ubiquiti UDM-Pro — leads on throughput (90 vs 88). Compared on the throughput sub-score.