Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Threadripper Pro 7975WX — Zen 4 · 32C/64T · sTR5
AMD

Threadripper Pro 7975WX

Zen 4 · 32C/64T · sTR5

94
/ 100
From $3,900
VS
Threadripper Pro 7975WX wins by 1
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz

93
/ 100
From $649
Specdex verdict

Threadripper Pro 7975WX takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Threadripper Pro 7975WX lands at 94 and Intel Core Ultra 9 395K at 93. That puts Threadripper Pro 7975WX ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Threadripper Pro 7975WX if…

  • Massive core counts
  • ECC memory support
  • Workstation/server-grade platform

Pick Intel Core Ultra 9 395K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on gaming (94 vs 74).

Creators & productivity

Tie

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on efficiency (86 vs 78).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K more score per dollar ($649 vs $3,900).

Threadripper Pro 7975WX 94
vs
93 Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Score breakdown

Threadripper Pro 7975WX
94
single 86
multi 94
gaming 74
efficiency 78
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
93
single 95
multi 93
gaming 94
efficiency 86

Specs side-by-side

Threadripper Pro 7975WX versus Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — full spec comparison
Spec Threadripper Pro 7975WX Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
Architecture
Zen 4
Panther Lake
Cores
32
26 (8P+16E+2LP)
Threads
64
26
Socket
sTR5
LGA1851
Release year
2023
2025

Threadripper Pro 7975WX

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • High TDP requires serious cooling
  • Premium price

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

FAQ: Threadripper Pro 7975WX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Which is better, Threadripper Pro 7975WX or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

Threadripper Pro 7975WX scores 94 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Threadripper Pro 7975WX worth the price? +

At $3,900, Threadripper Pro 7975WX delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in multi.

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 395K worth the price? +

At $649, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Does Threadripper Pro 7975WX or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Threadripper Pro 7975WX or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on gaming (94 vs 74). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for power efficiency, Threadripper Pro 7975WX or Intel Core Ultra 9 395K? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on efficiency (86 vs 78). Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost.