AMD
Threadripper Pro 7975WX
Zen 4 · 32C/64T · sTR5
94
/ 100
From $3,900
VS
EPYC 9654 wins by 2
AMD
EPYC 9654
Zen 4 · 96C/192T · SP5
96
/ 100
From $11,805
Specdex verdict
EPYC 9654 takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, Threadripper Pro 7975WX lands at 94 and EPYC 9654 at 96. That puts EPYC 9654 ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick Threadripper Pro 7975WX if…
- ✓Massive core counts
- ✓ECC memory support
- ✓Workstation/server-grade platform
Pick EPYC 9654 if…
- ✓Massive core counts
- ✓ECC memory support
- ✓Workstation/server-grade platform
Threadripper Pro 7975WX 94
vs 96 EPYC 9654
Score breakdown
Threadripper Pro 7975WX
94 single 86
multi 94
gaming 74
efficiency 78
EPYC 9654
96 single 88
multi 96
gaming 76
efficiency 78
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Threadripper Pro 7975WX | EPYC 9654 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 |
| Cores | 32 | ▲ 96 |
| Threads | 64 | ▲ 192 |
| Socket | sTR5 | SP5 |
| Release year | 2023 | 2022 |
Threadripper Pro 7975WX
Pros
- +Massive core counts
- +ECC memory support
- +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
- −Niche platform, limited motherboards
- −High TDP requires serious cooling
- −Premium price
EPYC 9654
Pros
- +Massive core counts
- +ECC memory support
- +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
- −Niche platform, limited motherboards
- −High TDP requires serious cooling
- −Premium price
FAQ: Threadripper Pro 7975WX vs EPYC 9654
Which is better, Threadripper Pro 7975WX or EPYC 9654? +
EPYC 9654 scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Threadripper Pro 7975WX worth the price? +
At $3,900, Threadripper Pro 7975WX delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in multi.
Is EPYC 9654 worth the price? +
At $11,805, EPYC 9654 delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in multi.
Does Threadripper Pro 7975WX or EPYC 9654 last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.