Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare — PCIe 5.0 · 12400/11800 MB/s · 1TB
TeamGroup

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare

PCIe 5.0 · 12400/11800 MB/s · 1TB

92
/ 100
From $180
VS
TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare wins by 8
XPG MARS 980 PRO — PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #12
XPG

XPG MARS 980 PRO

PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #12

84
/ 100
From $200
Specdex verdict

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare lands at 92 and XPG MARS 980 PRO at 84. That puts TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare ahead by 8 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick XPG MARS 980 PRO if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (89,200) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare more score per dollar ($180 vs $200).

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare 92
vs
84 XPG MARS 980 PRO

Score breakdown

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare
92
read 98
write 96
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
XPG MARS 980 PRO
84
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 84
passmark_disk 89200

Specs side-by-side

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare versus XPG MARS 980 PRO — full spec comparison
Spec TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare XPG MARS 980 PRO
Interface
PCIe 5.0
Capacity
1TB
Read/Write
12400/11800 MB/s
PassMark Disk Score
89,200
PassMark rank
#12 of 100 consumer SSDs

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

XPG MARS 980 PRO

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (89,200) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

FAQ: TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare vs XPG MARS 980 PRO

Which is better, TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 PRO? +

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 8. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare worth the price? +

At $180, TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in read.

Is XPG MARS 980 PRO worth the price? +

At $200, XPG MARS 980 PRO delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 PRO last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 PRO? +

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea Z540 1TB · bare — more score per dollar ($180 vs $200). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.