Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sony FX3 — full-frame · 2021
Sony

Sony FX3

full-frame · 2021

90
/ 100
From $3,898
VS
Canon EOS R6 Mark II wins by 1
Canon EOS R6 Mark II — full-frame · 2022
Canon

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

full-frame · 2022

91
/ 100
From $2,499
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R6 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sony FX3 lands at 90 and Canon EOS R6 Mark II at 91. That puts Canon EOS R6 Mark II ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Sony FX3 if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Canon EOS R6 Mark II if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Tie

Compared on the photo sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Tie

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Video

Tie

Compared on the video sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R6 Mark II more score per dollar ($2,499 vs $3,898).

Sony FX3 90
vs
91 Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Score breakdown

Sony FX3
90
photo 90
video 86
autofocus 88
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
91
photo 91
video 87
autofocus 89
ergonomics 86

Specs side-by-side

Sony FX3 versus Canon EOS R6 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Sony FX3 Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Format
full-frame
full-frame
Release year
2021
2022

Sony FX3

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

FAQ: Sony FX3 vs Canon EOS R6 Mark II

Which is better, Sony FX3 or Canon EOS R6 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R6 Mark II scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sony FX3 worth the price? +

At $3,898, Sony FX3 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R6 Mark II worth the price? +

At $2,499, Canon EOS R6 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in photo.

Does Sony FX3 or Canon EOS R6 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Sony FX3 or Canon EOS R6 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R6 Mark II — more score per dollar ($2,499 vs $3,898). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.