Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — GM II · 1045g · OIS · L-Series benchmark
Sony

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

GM II · 1045g · OIS · L-Series benchmark

96
/ 100
From $2,799
VS
Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II wins by 9
Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD — Prime/zoom
Tamron

Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD

Prime/zoom

87
/ 100
From $1,299
Specdex verdict

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II lands at 96 and Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD at 87. That puts Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II ahead by 9 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II if…

  • 29% lighter than original 70-200 GM
  • Industry-best AF with linear motors
  • Excellent close focus

Pick Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD if…

  • Proven optical formula
  • Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • Strong resale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the build sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on build (96 vs 90).

Sharpness

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on sharpness (96 vs 87).

Autofocus

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II leads on af (100 vs 83).

Value for money

Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD more score per dollar ($1,299 vs $2,799).

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II 96
vs
87 Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD

Score breakdown

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II
96
sharpness 96
af 100
build 96
stabilization 92
value 84
Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD
87
sharpness 87
af 83
build 90
stabilization 0
value 86

Specs side-by-side

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II versus Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD — full spec comparison
Spec Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD
Mount
Sony E
Focal length
70-200 mm
Aperture
f/2.8
Construction
17 elements / 14 groups
Stabilization
OSS
Min focus
0.40 m (wide) / 0.82 m (tele)
Filter
77 mm
Weight
1045 g

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II

Pros
  • +29% lighter than original 70-200 GM
  • +Industry-best AF with linear motors
  • +Excellent close focus
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Heavy at 1045g
  • External zoom changes balance

Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Older AF motor on some
  • Heavier than modern counterparts

FAQ: Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II vs Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD

Which is better, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II or Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 9. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II worth the price? +

At $2,799, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in af.

Is Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD worth the price? +

At $1,299, Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in build.

Does Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II or Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II or Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — leads on build (96 vs 90). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II or Tamron 50-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III VC VXD? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS II — leads on sharpness (96 vs 87). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.