Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — Prime/zoom
Sigma

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Prime/zoom

88
/ 100
From $2,000
VS
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR wins by 4
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — Prime/Zoom
Fujifilm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,599
Specdex verdict

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports lands at 88 and Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR at 92. That puts Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale

Pick Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the build sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on build (94 vs 90).

Sharpness

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on sharpness (92 vs 88).

Autofocus

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR leads on af (91 vs 84).

Value for money

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR more score per dollar ($1,599 vs $2,000).

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports 88
vs
92 Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Score breakdown

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports
88
sharpness 88
af 84
build 90
value 86
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports versus Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — full spec comparison
Spec Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports vs Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR

Which is better, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports worth the price? +

At $2,000, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in build.

Is Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR worth the price? +

At $1,599, Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Does Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on build (94 vs 90). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports or Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR? +

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR — leads on sharpness (92 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.