Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare — PCIe 4.0 · 7300/6900 MB/s · 4TB
Seagate

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare

PCIe 4.0 · 7300/6900 MB/s · 4TB

86
/ 100
From $360
VS
Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare — PCIe 4.0 · 7450/6900 MB/s · 2TB
Samsung

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare

PCIe 4.0 · 7450/6900 MB/s · 2TB

86
/ 100
From $180
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare lands at 86 and Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare at 86. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Endurance & reliability

Tie

Write endurance and long-term dependability

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare more score per dollar ($180 vs $360).

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare 86
vs
86 Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare

Score breakdown

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare
86
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84
Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare
86
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare versus Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare — full spec comparison
Spec Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare
Interface
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Capacity
4TB
2TB
Read/Write
7300/6900 MB/s
7450/6900 MB/s

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

FAQ: Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare vs Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare

Which is better, Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare? +

Both score 86 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare worth the price? +

At $360, Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Is Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare worth the price? +

At $180, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Does Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB · bare or Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare? +

Samsung 990 Pro 2TB · bare — more score per dollar ($180 vs $360). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.