Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung S95F OLED — QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz
Samsung

Samsung S95F OLED

QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz

94
/ 100
From $3,499
VS
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" wins by 1
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" — QD-OLED · Glare-Free · One Connect
Samsung

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"

QD-OLED · Glare-Free · One Connect

95
/ 100
From $3,399
Specdex verdict

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung S95F OLED lands at 94 and Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" at 95. That puts Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung S95F OLED if…

  • QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • 165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • OneConnect Box keeps panel thin

Pick Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" if…

  • Best anti-glare finish ever
  • QD-OLED color volume
  • One Connect box
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Tie

Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Smart platform

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"

OS speed, app support, ecosystem

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" leads on smart (84 vs 80).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Samsung S95F OLED 94
vs
95 Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"

Score breakdown

Samsung S95F OLED
94
display 95
motion 96
hdr 92
gaming 96
smart 80
picture 0
sound 0
Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
95
display 0
motion 96
hdr 0
gaming 96
smart 84
picture 97
sound 78

Specs side-by-side

Samsung S95F OLED versus Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung S95F OLED Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"
Display
55″ / 65″ / 77″ QD-OLED Gen 4
Resolution
4K @ 165 Hz
Peak brightness
~2,100 nits (RTINGS measured 10% window)
HDR
HDR10+ + HDR10
HDR10+, HLG
HDMI
4× HDMI 2.1
4× HDMI 2.1
VRR
Yes
ALLM
Yes
Panel
QD-OLED
Size
65″
Refresh
144Hz

Samsung S95F OLED

Pros
  • +QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • +165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • +OneConnect Box keeps panel thin
Cons
  • No Dolby Vision (HDR10+ only)
  • Tizen OS slower than LG webOS
  • Expensive at 65″+

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"

Pros
  • +Best anti-glare finish ever
  • +QD-OLED color volume
  • +One Connect box
Cons
  • No Dolby Vision
  • Anti-glare layer softens darks slightly
  • Tizen ads

FAQ: Samsung S95F OLED vs Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"

Which is better, Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"? +

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung S95F OLED worth the price? +

At $3,499, Samsung S95F OLED delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in motion.

Is Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" worth the price? +

At $3,399, Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in picture.

Does Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for smart platform, Samsung S95F OLED or Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65"? +

Samsung S95D QD-OLED 65" — leads on smart (84 vs 80). OS speed, app support, ecosystem.