Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung S95D 65" — QD-OLED · 65" · 2024
Samsung

Samsung S95D 65"

QD-OLED · 65" · 2024

95
/ 100
From $4,249
VS
Samsung S95D 65" wins by 1
Samsung S95F OLED — QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz
Samsung

Samsung S95F OLED

QD-OLED Gen 4 · ~2,100 nits · 165 Hz

94
/ 100
From $3,499
Specdex verdict

Samsung S95D 65" takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung S95D 65" lands at 95 and Samsung S95F OLED at 94. That puts Samsung S95D 65" ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung S95D 65" if…

  • Strong HDR performance
  • Current smart platform
  • HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports

Pick Samsung S95F OLED if…

  • QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • 165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • OneConnect Box keeps panel thin
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Samsung S95F OLED

Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support

Samsung S95F OLED leads on gaming (96 vs 91).

Smart platform

Samsung S95D 65"

OS speed, app support, ecosystem

Samsung S95D 65" leads on smart (82 vs 80).

Value for money

Samsung S95F OLED

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung S95F OLED more score per dollar ($3,499 vs $4,249).

Samsung S95D 65" 95
vs
94 Samsung S95F OLED

Score breakdown

Samsung S95D 65"
95
picture 95
motion 93
gaming 91
smart 82
sound 78
display 0
hdr 0
Samsung S95F OLED
94
picture 0
motion 96
gaming 96
smart 80
sound 0
display 95
hdr 92

Specs side-by-side

Samsung S95D 65" versus Samsung S95F OLED — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung S95D 65" Samsung S95F OLED
Panel
QD-OLED
Size
65"
Refresh
120Hz
Release year
2024
Display
55″ / 65″ / 77″ QD-OLED Gen 4
Resolution
4K @ 165 Hz
Peak brightness
~2,100 nits (RTINGS measured 10% window)
HDR
HDR10+ + HDR10
HDMI
4× HDMI 2.1
VRR
Yes
ALLM
Yes

Samsung S95D 65"

Pros
  • +Strong HDR performance
  • +Current smart platform
  • +HDMI 2.1 on most HDMI ports
Cons
  • Ads on smart platform
  • Sound trails dedicated audio
  • Large footprint

Samsung S95F OLED

Pros
  • +QD-OLED Gen 4 with ~2,100 nit peak (RTINGS measured)
  • +165 Hz with full HDMI 2.1
  • +OneConnect Box keeps panel thin
Cons
  • No Dolby Vision (HDR10+ only)
  • Tizen OS slower than LG webOS
  • Expensive at 65″+

FAQ: Samsung S95D 65" vs Samsung S95F OLED

Which is better, Samsung S95D 65" or Samsung S95F OLED? +

Samsung S95D 65" scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung S95D 65" worth the price? +

At $4,249, Samsung S95D 65" delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in picture.

Is Samsung S95F OLED worth the price? +

At $3,499, Samsung S95F OLED delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in motion.

Does Samsung S95D 65" or Samsung S95F OLED last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Samsung S95D 65" or Samsung S95F OLED? +

Samsung S95F OLED — leads on gaming (96 vs 91). Input lag, VRR, 120 Hz support.

Which is better for smart platform, Samsung S95D 65" or Samsung S95F OLED? +

Samsung S95D 65" — leads on smart (82 vs 80). OS speed, app support, ecosystem.