Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB
Samsung

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB

86
/ 100
From $140
VS
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare wins by 16
XPG MARS 980 STORM — PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #62
XPG

XPG MARS 980 STORM

PCIe 4.0 NVMe · PassMark #62

70
/ 100
From $200
Specdex verdict

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare lands at 86 and XPG MARS 980 STORM at 70. That puts Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare ahead by 16 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick XPG MARS 980 STORM if…

  • Capable NVMe drive at PassMark rank #62
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare more score per dollar ($140 vs $200).

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare 86
vs
70 XPG MARS 980 STORM

Score breakdown

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare
86
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
XPG MARS 980 STORM
70
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 70
passmark_disk 74315

Specs side-by-side

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare versus XPG MARS 980 STORM — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare XPG MARS 980 STORM
Interface
PCIe 3.0
Capacity
2TB
Read/Write
3500/3300 MB/s
PassMark Disk Score
74,315
PassMark rank
#62 of 100 consumer SSDs

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

XPG MARS 980 STORM

Pros
  • +Capable NVMe drive at PassMark rank #62
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Newer drives out-perform this generation on sequential + random 4K

FAQ: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare vs XPG MARS 980 STORM

Which is better, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 STORM? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 16. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare worth the price? +

At $140, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Is XPG MARS 980 STORM worth the price? +

At $200, XPG MARS 980 STORM delivers a Specdex score of 70 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 STORM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or XPG MARS 980 STORM? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — more score per dollar ($140 vs $200). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.