Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB
Samsung

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB

86
/ 100
From $140
VS
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare wins by 6
Viper PV593 2TB — 2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #27
Viper

Viper PV593 2TB

2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #27

80
/ 100
From $150
Specdex verdict

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare lands at 86 and Viper PV593 2TB at 80. That puts Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare ahead by 6 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick Viper PV593 2TB if…

  • Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #27
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare more score per dollar ($140 vs $150).

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare 86
vs
80 Viper PV593 2TB

Score breakdown

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare
86
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
Viper PV593 2TB
80
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 80
passmark_disk 84747

Specs side-by-side

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare versus Viper PV593 2TB — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare Viper PV593 2TB
Interface
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Capacity
2TB
Read/Write
3500/3300 MB/s
Form factor
M.2 2280
Sequential read
14,000 MB/s
Sequential write
13,000 MB/s
Random read
2,000,000 IOPS
Random write
1,650,000 IOPS
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2508 (TSMC 6nm, 8-channel)
NAND
232-layer Micron B58R 3D TLC
DRAM
yes (DRAM cache)
Endurance
1,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
84,747
PassMark rank
#27 of 100 consumer SSDs

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

Viper PV593 2TB

Pros
  • +Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #27
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

FAQ: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare vs Viper PV593 2TB

Which is better, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or Viper PV593 2TB? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 6. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare worth the price? +

At $140, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Is Viper PV593 2TB worth the price? +

At $150, Viper PV593 2TB delivers a Specdex score of 80 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or Viper PV593 2TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare or Viper PV593 2TB? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — more score per dollar ($140 vs $150). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.