Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare — PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 1TB
Samsung

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare

PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 1TB

86
/ 100
From $70
VS
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare wins by 1
WD BLACK SN8100 4TB — 4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,900 MB/s read · PassMark #9
Western Digital

WD BLACK SN8100 4TB

4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,900 MB/s read · PassMark #9

85
/ 100
From $549
Specdex verdict

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare lands at 86 and WD BLACK SN8100 4TB at 85. That puts Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity

Pick WD BLACK SN8100 4TB if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (90,416) — sustained-write class-leading
  • PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare more score per dollar ($70 vs $549).

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare 86
vs
85 WD BLACK SN8100 4TB

Score breakdown

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare
86
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
WD BLACK SN8100 4TB
85
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
ssd 85
passmark_disk 90416

Specs side-by-side

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare versus WD BLACK SN8100 4TB — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare WD BLACK SN8100 4TB
Interface
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Capacity
1TB
Read/Write
3500/3300 MB/s
Form factor
M.2 2280 (single-sided)
Sequential read
14,900 MB/s
Sequential write
14,000 MB/s
Random read
2,300,000 IOPS
Random write
2,400,000 IOPS
Controller
SanDisk-tuned Silicon Motion SM2508 (6nm, quad Cortex-R8)
NAND
218-layer BiCS8 CBA 3D TLC
DRAM
yes (onboard DRAM)
Endurance
2,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
90,416
PassMark rank
#9 of 100 consumer SSDs

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

WD BLACK SN8100 4TB

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (90,416) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Cons
  • PCIe 5.0 drives run hot — heatsink or motherboard M.2 cooling recommended
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

FAQ: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare vs WD BLACK SN8100 4TB

Which is better, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare or WD BLACK SN8100 4TB? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare worth the price? +

At $70, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Is WD BLACK SN8100 4TB worth the price? +

At $549, WD BLACK SN8100 4TB delivers a Specdex score of 85 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare or WD BLACK SN8100 4TB last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare or WD BLACK SN8100 4TB? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB · bare — more score per dollar ($70 vs $549). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.