Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD — 4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #22
Samsung

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD

4TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,800 MB/s read · PassMark #22

81
/ 100
From $549
VS
XPG MARS 980 BLADE wins by 2
XPG MARS 980 BLADE — PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17
XPG

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #17

83
/ 100
From $300
Specdex verdict

XPG MARS 980 BLADE takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD lands at 81 and XPG MARS 980 BLADE at 83. That puts XPG MARS 980 BLADE ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD if…

  • Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #22
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)

Pick XPG MARS 980 BLADE if…

  • PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • Current street price around $721
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

XPG MARS 980 BLADE more score per dollar ($300 vs $549).

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD 81
vs
83 XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Score breakdown

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD
81
ssd 81
passmark_disk 85796
XPG MARS 980 BLADE
83
ssd 83
passmark_disk 88359

Specs side-by-side

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD versus XPG MARS 980 BLADE — full spec comparison
Spec Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD XPG MARS 980 BLADE
Form factor
M.2 2280
M.2 2280 (passive, heat-spreader label)
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
Sequential read
14,800 MB/s
14,000 MB/s
Sequential write
13,400 MB/s
13,000 MB/s
Random read
2,200,000 IOPS
2,000,000 IOPS
Random write
2,600,000 IOPS
1,650,000 IOPS
Controller
Samsung Presto (in-house, 5nm)
Silicon Motion SM2508 (TSMC 6nm)
NAND
Samsung V8 V-NAND 3D TLC (236-layer)
232-layer Micron 3D TLC
DRAM
yes, LPDDR4X
yes (DRAM cache buffer)
Endurance
2,400 TBW
1,480 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
85,796
88,359
PassMark rank
#22 of 100 consumer SSDs
#17 of 100 consumer SSDs

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD

Pros
  • +Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #22
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
  • +PCIe 5.0 interface for next-gen platforms (AM5, LGA 1851)
Cons
  • PCIe 5.0 drives run hot — heatsink or motherboard M.2 cooling recommended

XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Pros
  • +PassMark Disk Score top-20 (88,359) — sustained-write class-leading
  • +Current street price around $721
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes

FAQ: Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD vs XPG MARS 980 BLADE

Which is better, Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD or XPG MARS 980 BLADE? +

XPG MARS 980 BLADE scores 83 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD worth the price? +

At $549, Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD delivers a Specdex score of 81 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Is XPG MARS 980 BLADE worth the price? +

At $300, XPG MARS 980 BLADE delivers a Specdex score of 83 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Does Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD or XPG MARS 980 BLADE last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB SSD or XPG MARS 980 BLADE? +

XPG MARS 980 BLADE — more score per dollar ($300 vs $549). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.