Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — 24C/48T · 4.5 GHz · 280 W TDP · sTRX4 · PassMark #221
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

24C/48T · 4.5 GHz · 280 W TDP · sTRX4 · PassMark #221

30
/ 100
From $870
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K wins by 59
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Core Ultra 9 285K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X lands at 30 and Core Ultra 9 285K at 89. That puts Core Ultra 9 285K ahead by 59 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Ryzen Threadripper 3960X if…

  • PassMark CPU Mark of 54,791 — solid multi-thread numbers
  • HEDT platform with abundant PCIe and memory lanes
  • Current PassMark-tracked street price around $870

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Core Ultra 9 285K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Core Ultra 9 285K more score per dollar ($589 vs $870).

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 30
vs
89 Core Ultra 9 285K

Score breakdown

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
30
cpu 30
passmark 54791
single 0
multi 0
gaming 0
efficiency 0
Core Ultra 9 285K
89
cpu 0
passmark 0
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90

Specs side-by-side

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X versus Core Ultra 9 285K — full spec comparison
Spec Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Core Ultra 9 285K
Cores
24
24 (8P + 16E)
Threads
48
24
Base clock
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost clock
4.5 GHz
5.7 GHz
L3 cache
128 MB
36 MB
TDP
280 W
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
Socket
sTRX4
LGA1851
Class
Desktop
PassMark rank
#221 of 5,901
PassMark CPU Mark
54,791
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Pros
  • +PassMark CPU Mark of 54,791 — solid multi-thread numbers
  • +HEDT platform with abundant PCIe and memory lanes
  • +Current PassMark-tracked street price around $870
Cons
  • HEDT motherboards and cooling raise total platform cost
  • Newer-generation parts pull ahead in current rankings

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

FAQ: Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs Core Ultra 9 285K

Which is better, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K scores 89 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 59. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Ryzen Threadripper 3960X worth the price? +

At $870, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X delivers a Specdex score of 30 — strongest in passmark.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Does Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Core Ultra 9 285K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — more score per dollar ($589 vs $870). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.