Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT — RDNA 2 · 4 GB GDDR6 · 107 W · Nitro+
Sapphire

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT

RDNA 2 · 4 GB GDDR6 · 107 W · Nitro+

55
/ 100
From $264
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 — Turing · 4 GB GDDR5 · 75 W
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

Turing · 4 GB GDDR5 · 75 W

55
/ 100
From $149
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT lands at 55 and GeForce GTX 1650 at 55. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT if…

  • ✓More VRAM at price tier
  • ✓FSR support
  • ✓Driver open-source on Linux

Pick GeForce GTX 1650 if…

  • ✓NVIDIA driver stack
  • ✓DLSS support on RTX
  • ✓Strong resale value
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

4K & rasterization

Tie

Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Ray tracing

GeForce GTX 1650

RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting

GeForce GTX 1650 leads on rt (50 vs 45).

AI workloads

GeForce GTX 1650

Local inference, upscaling, generative tools

GeForce GTX 1650 leads on ai (52 vs 40).

Power efficiency

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT

Frames per watt — heat, noise, and PSU sizing

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT leads on efficiency (77 vs 70).

Value for money

GeForce GTX 1650

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

GeForce GTX 1650 more score per dollar ($149 vs $264).

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT 55
vs
55 GeForce GTX 1650

Score breakdown

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT
55
raster 55
rt 45
ai 40
efficiency 77
GeForce GTX 1650
55
raster 55
rt 50
ai 52
efficiency 70

Specs side-by-side

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT versus GeForce GTX 1650 — full spec comparison
Spec Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT GeForce GTX 1650
Architecture
RDNA 2
Turing
VRAM
4 GB GDDR6
4 GB GDDR5
TBP
107 W
75 W
Release year
2022
2019

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT

Pros
  • +More VRAM at price tier
  • +FSR support
  • +Driver open-source on Linux
Cons
  • −RT trails NVIDIA
  • −AI ecosystem smaller
  • −Driver day-0 bugs

GeForce GTX 1650

Pros
  • +NVIDIA driver stack
  • +DLSS support on RTX
  • +Strong resale value
Cons
  • −Power draw scales with tier
  • −Gen-over-gen price creep
  • −VRAM gated per tier

FAQ: Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650

Which is better, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT or GeForce GTX 1650? +

Both score 55 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT worth the price? +

At $264, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT delivers a Specdex score of 55 — strongest in efficiency.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 worth the price? +

At $149, GeForce GTX 1650 delivers a Specdex score of 55 — strongest in efficiency.

Does Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT or GeForce GTX 1650 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for ray tracing, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT or GeForce GTX 1650? +

GeForce GTX 1650 — leads on rt (50 vs 45). RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting.

Which is better for AI workloads, Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6500 XT or GeForce GTX 1650? +

GeForce GTX 1650 — leads on ai (52 vs 40). Local inference, upscaling, generative tools.