Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 — Ampere · 20 GB GDDR6 ECC · 200 W · Aorus Master
Gigabyte

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500

Ampere · 20 GB GDDR6 ECC · 200 W · Aorus Master

84
/ 100
From $2,210
VS
GeForce RTX 5090 wins by 14
GeForce RTX 5090 — Blackwell · 32 GB GDDR7 · 575 W
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 5090

Blackwell · 32 GB GDDR7 · 575 W

98
/ 100
From $1,999
Specdex verdict

GeForce RTX 5090 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 lands at 84 and GeForce RTX 5090 at 98. That puts GeForce RTX 5090 ahead by 14 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 if…

  • ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • ISV certifications
  • Huge framebuffer

Pick GeForce RTX 5090 if…

  • Unrivaled 4K and path-tracing
  • DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Gen
  • 32 GB VRAM for AI
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

4K & rasterization

GeForce RTX 5090

Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on raster (100 vs 79).

Ray tracing

GeForce RTX 5090

RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on rt (100 vs 84).

AI workloads

GeForce RTX 5090

Local inference, upscaling, generative tools

GeForce RTX 5090 leads on ai (100 vs 85).

Power efficiency

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500

Frames per watt — heat, noise, and PSU sizing

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 leads on efficiency (85 vs 78).

Value for money

GeForce RTX 5090

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

GeForce RTX 5090 more score per dollar ($1,999 vs $2,210).

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 84
vs
98 GeForce RTX 5090

Score breakdown

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500
84
raster 79
rt 84
ai 85
efficiency 85
GeForce RTX 5090
98
raster 100
rt 100
ai 100
efficiency 78

Specs side-by-side

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 versus GeForce RTX 5090 — full spec comparison
Spec Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 GeForce RTX 5090
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell
VRAM
20 GB GDDR6 ECC
32 GB GDDR7
TBP
200 W
575 W
Release year
2021
CUDA cores
21,760
Tensor cores
680 (5th gen)
RT cores
170 (4th gen)
Memory bus
512-bit
Bandwidth
1792 GB/s
PCIe
PCIe 5.0 x16

Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500

Pros
  • +ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • +ISV certifications
  • +Huge framebuffer
Cons
  • Expensive per-frame vs consumer
  • Lower gaming clocks
  • Driver optimized for CAD/DCC not games

GeForce RTX 5090

Pros
  • +Unrivaled 4K and path-tracing
  • +DLSS 4 Multi-Frame Gen
  • +32 GB VRAM for AI
Cons
  • Enormous power draw
  • Two-slot+ cooler required
  • Scarce MSRP supply

FAQ: Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 vs GeForce RTX 5090

Which is better, Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 scores 98 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 14. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 worth the price? +

At $2,210, Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in ai.

Is GeForce RTX 5090 worth the price? +

At $1,999, GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a Specdex score of 98 — strongest in raster.

Does Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 or GeForce RTX 5090 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for 4K gaming, Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 — leads on raster (100 vs 79). Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution.

Which is better for ray tracing, Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX A4500 or GeForce RTX 5090? +

GeForce RTX 5090 — leads on rt (100 vs 84). RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting.