Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Ricoh GR III — APS-C compact · 2019
Ricoh

Ricoh GR III

APS-C compact · 2019

86
/ 100
From $899
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 9
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Ricoh GR III lands at 86 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 9 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Ricoh GR III if…

  • Mature system, great used market
  • Proven lens lineup
  • Often on sale

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 86).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 82).

Ergonomics

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the ergonomics sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on ergonomics (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Ricoh GR III

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Ricoh GR III more score per dollar ($899 vs $4,299).

Ricoh GR III 86
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Ricoh GR III
86
photo 86
video 78
autofocus 82
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Ricoh GR III versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Ricoh GR III Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
APS-C compact
Release year
2019
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Ricoh GR III

Pros
  • +Mature system, great used market
  • +Proven lens lineup
  • +Often on sale
Cons
  • Older AF system
  • Heavier than modern mirrorless
  • Firmware updates trailed off

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Ricoh GR III vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Ricoh GR III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 9. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Ricoh GR III worth the price? +

At $899, Ricoh GR III delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Ricoh GR III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Ricoh GR III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 86). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Ricoh GR III or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 82). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.