Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Radeon Pro W7900 — RDNA 3 · 48 GB GDDR6 · 295 W
AMD

Radeon Pro W7900

RDNA 3 · 48 GB GDDR6 · 295 W

90
/ 100
From $3,999
VS
Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 wins by 2
Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 — Ada · 16 GB GDDR6X · 320 W · Aorus Master
Gigabyte

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Ada · 16 GB GDDR6X · 320 W · Aorus Master

92
/ 100
From $1,344
Specdex verdict

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Radeon Pro W7900 lands at 90 and Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 at 92. That puts Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Radeon Pro W7900 if…

  • ✓ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • ✓ISV certifications
  • ✓Huge framebuffer

Pick Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 if…

  • ✓NVIDIA driver stack
  • ✓DLSS support on RTX
  • ✓Strong resale value
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

4K & rasterization

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 leads on raster (92 vs 85).

Ray tracing

Radeon Pro W7900

RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting

Radeon Pro W7900 leads on rt (90 vs 87).

AI workloads

Radeon Pro W7900

Local inference, upscaling, generative tools

Radeon Pro W7900 leads on ai (91 vs 89).

Power efficiency

Radeon Pro W7900

Frames per watt — heat, noise, and PSU sizing

Radeon Pro W7900 leads on efficiency (85 vs 73).

Value for money

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 more score per dollar ($1,344 vs $3,999).

Radeon Pro W7900 90
vs
92 Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Score breakdown

Radeon Pro W7900
90
raster 85
rt 90
ai 91
efficiency 85
Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080
92
raster 92
rt 87
ai 89
efficiency 73

Specs side-by-side

Radeon Pro W7900 versus Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 — full spec comparison
Spec Radeon Pro W7900 Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080
Architecture
RDNA 3
Ada
VRAM
▲ 48 GB GDDR6
16 GB GDDR6X
TBP
295 W
320 W
Release year
2023
2022

Radeon Pro W7900

Pros
  • +ECC VRAM for professional workloads
  • +ISV certifications
  • +Huge framebuffer
Cons
  • −Expensive per-frame vs consumer
  • −Lower gaming clocks
  • −Driver optimized for CAD/DCC not games

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Pros
  • +NVIDIA driver stack
  • +DLSS support on RTX
  • +Strong resale value
Cons
  • −Power draw scales with tier
  • −Gen-over-gen price creep
  • −VRAM gated per tier

FAQ: Radeon Pro W7900 vs Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080

Which is better, Radeon Pro W7900 or Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080? +

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Radeon Pro W7900 worth the price? +

At $3,999, Radeon Pro W7900 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in ai.

Is Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 worth the price? +

At $1,344, Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in raster.

Does Radeon Pro W7900 or Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for 4K gaming, Radeon Pro W7900 or Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080? +

Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080 — leads on raster (92 vs 85). Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution.

Which is better for ray tracing, Radeon Pro W7900 or Gigabyte Aorus Master GeForce RTX 4080? +

Radeon Pro W7900 — leads on rt (90 vs 87). RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting.