Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
QNAP TS-673A — NAS · $999
QNAP

QNAP TS-673A

NAS · $999

86
/ 100
From $999
VS
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — 4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE
UGREEN

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE

86
/ 100
From $499
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, QNAP TS-673A lands at 86 and UGREEN NASync DXP4800 at 86. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick QNAP TS-673A if…

  • ✓Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
  • ✓NVMe cache slots on newer models
  • ✓Docker/VM support on higher tiers

Pick UGREEN NASync DXP4800 if…

  • ✓10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • ✓Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • ✓NVMe cache x2
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Performance

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Compared on the performance sub-score

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 leads on performance (92 vs 86).

Features

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Compared on the features sub-score

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 leads on features (90 vs 86).

Software

QNAP TS-673A

Compared on the software sub-score

QNAP TS-673A leads on software (84 vs 76).

Value for money

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 more score per dollar ($499 vs $999).

QNAP TS-673A 86
vs
86 UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Score breakdown

QNAP TS-673A
86
performance 86
features 86
software 84
value 82
UGREEN NASync DXP4800
86
performance 92
features 90
software 76
value 94

Specs side-by-side

QNAP TS-673A versus UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — full spec comparison
Spec QNAP TS-673A UGREEN NASync DXP4800
Bays
—
4
CPU
—
Intel N100
RAM
—
8 GB DDR5
Ports
—
2× 2.5 GbE + 1× 10 GbE

QNAP TS-673A

Pros
  • +Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
  • +NVMe cache slots on newer models
  • +Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Cons
  • −Disks rarely included
  • −Drive compatibility restrictions on some brands
  • −Power draw 24/7

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Pros
  • +10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • +Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • +NVMe cache x2
Cons
  • −UGOS still maturing
  • −No mature app store vs DSM
  • −Warranty support is new

FAQ: QNAP TS-673A vs UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Which is better, QNAP TS-673A or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

Both score 86 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is QNAP TS-673A worth the price? +

At $999, QNAP TS-673A delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in performance.

Is UGREEN NASync DXP4800 worth the price? +

At $499, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in value.

Does QNAP TS-673A or UGREEN NASync DXP4800 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for performance, QNAP TS-673A or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — leads on performance (92 vs 86). Compared on the performance sub-score.

Which is better for features, QNAP TS-673A or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — leads on features (90 vs 86). Compared on the features sub-score.