Skip to content
Specdex
QNAP

QNAP TS-673A

NAS · $999

86
/ 100
From $999
VS
Synology DS1825+ wins by 5
Synology

Synology DS1825+

8-bay · Ryzen V1500B · DSM 7.2

91
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Synology DS1825+ takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, QNAP TS-673A lands at 86 and Synology DS1825+ at 91. That puts Synology DS1825+ ahead by 5 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick QNAP TS-673A if…

  • Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
  • NVMe cache slots on newer models
  • Docker/VM support on higher tiers

Pick Synology DS1825+ if…

  • 8 bays with DSM polish
  • NVMe cache slots
  • Great backup ecosystem

Score breakdown

QNAP TS-673A
86
performance 86
features 86
software 84
value 82
Synology DS1825+
91
performance 86
features 94
software 98
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Spec
QNAP TS-673A
Synology DS1825+
Bays
8
CPU
AMD Ryzen V1500B
RAM
8 GB ECC (32 GB max)
Ports
4× GbE + optional 10 GbE

QNAP TS-673A

Pros
  • +Rich software ecosystem (Synology/QNAP)
  • +NVMe cache slots on newer models
  • +Docker/VM support on higher tiers
Cons
  • Disks rarely included
  • Drive compatibility restrictions on some brands
  • Power draw 24/7

Synology DS1825+

Pros
  • +8 bays with DSM polish
  • +NVMe cache slots
  • +Great backup ecosystem
Cons
  • No 10 GbE built-in
  • Synology-only drive restrictions on some models
  • Premium price

FAQ: QNAP TS-673A vs Synology DS1825+

Which is better, QNAP TS-673A or Synology DS1825+? +

Synology DS1825+ scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 5. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is QNAP TS-673A worth the price? +

At $999, QNAP TS-673A delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in performance.

Is Synology DS1825+ worth the price? +

At $1,099, Synology DS1825+ delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in software.

Does QNAP TS-673A or Synology DS1825+ last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.