Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
QNAP TS-464 — 4-bay · N5095 · 2.5 GbE × 2 · PCIe expandable
QNAP

QNAP TS-464

4-bay · N5095 · 2.5 GbE × 2 · PCIe expandable

87
/ 100
From $599
VS
QNAP TS-464 wins by 1
UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — 4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE
UGREEN

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

4-bay · N100 · 2×2.5 GbE + 10 GbE

86
/ 100
From $499
Specdex verdict

QNAP TS-464 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, QNAP TS-464 lands at 87 and UGREEN NASync DXP4800 at 86. That puts QNAP TS-464 ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick QNAP TS-464 if…

  • ✓Dual 2.5 GbE standard
  • ✓PCIe expansion slot for 10 GbE
  • ✓Hardware transcoding

Pick UGREEN NASync DXP4800 if…

  • ✓10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • ✓Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • ✓NVMe cache x2
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Features

QNAP TS-464

Compared on the features sub-score

QNAP TS-464 leads on features (92 vs 90).

Performance

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Compared on the performance sub-score

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 leads on performance (92 vs 88).

Software

QNAP TS-464

Compared on the software sub-score

QNAP TS-464 leads on software (80 vs 76).

Value for money

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 more score per dollar ($499 vs $599).

QNAP TS-464 87
vs
86 UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Score breakdown

QNAP TS-464
87
performance 88
features 92
software 80
value 92
UGREEN NASync DXP4800
86
performance 92
features 90
software 76
value 94

Specs side-by-side

QNAP TS-464 versus UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — full spec comparison
Spec QNAP TS-464 UGREEN NASync DXP4800
Bays
4
4
CPU
▲ Intel Celeron N5095
Intel N100
RAM
8 GB (16 GB max)
8 GB DDR5
Ports
2× 2.5 GbE + PCIe slot
2× 2.5 GbE + 1× 10 GbE

QNAP TS-464

Pros
  • +Dual 2.5 GbE standard
  • +PCIe expansion slot for 10 GbE
  • +Hardware transcoding
Cons
  • −QTS still dense
  • −QNAP security history checkered
  • −Comes with 8 GB RAM only

UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Pros
  • +10 GbE on the mid-tier
  • +Intel iGPU for transcoding
  • +NVMe cache x2
Cons
  • −UGOS still maturing
  • −No mature app store vs DSM
  • −Warranty support is new

FAQ: QNAP TS-464 vs UGREEN NASync DXP4800

Which is better, QNAP TS-464 or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

QNAP TS-464 scores 87 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is QNAP TS-464 worth the price? +

At $599, QNAP TS-464 delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in features.

Is UGREEN NASync DXP4800 worth the price? +

At $499, UGREEN NASync DXP4800 delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in value.

Does QNAP TS-464 or UGREEN NASync DXP4800 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for features, QNAP TS-464 or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

QNAP TS-464 — leads on features (92 vs 90). Compared on the features sub-score.

Which is better for performance, QNAP TS-464 or UGREEN NASync DXP4800? +

UGREEN NASync DXP4800 — leads on performance (92 vs 88). Compared on the performance sub-score.