Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Powerbeats Fit — H1 chip · Wingtip · Heart-rate sensor
Beats

Powerbeats Fit

H1 chip · Wingtip · Heart-rate sensor

89
/ 100
From $199
VS
Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case wins by 3
Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case — True-wireless · 2023
Bose

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

True-wireless · 2023

92
/ 100
From $299
Specdex verdict

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Powerbeats Fit lands at 89 and Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case at 92. That puts Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Powerbeats Fit if…

  • ✓Heart-rate monitoring during workouts
  • ✓Wingtip stability for running
  • ✓IPX4 sweat/water resistance

Pick Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case if…

  • ✓Compact carry
  • ✓Platform integration (brand-dependent)
  • ✓Quick pair
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Comfort

Powerbeats Fit

Compared on the comfort sub-score

Powerbeats Fit leads on comfort (92 vs 90).

Sound

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

Compared on the sound sub-score

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case leads on sound (91 vs 88).

Features

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

Compared on the features sub-score

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case leads on features (88 vs 86).

Value for money

Powerbeats Fit

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Powerbeats Fit more score per dollar ($199 vs $299).

Powerbeats Fit 89
vs
92 Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

Score breakdown

Powerbeats Fit
89
sound 88
comfort 92
battery 86
durability 92
features 86
anc 0
Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case
92
sound 91
comfort 90
battery 78
durability 0
features 88
anc 89

Specs side-by-side

Powerbeats Fit versus Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case — full spec comparison
Spec Powerbeats Fit Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case
Driver
Custom dynamic
—
Bluetooth
5.3
—
Codecs
AAC + SBC
—
Battery
7 h (30 h with case)
—
Charging
USB-C
—
Weight
5.6 g per bud
—
IP rating
IPX4
—
Type
—
True-wireless
Release year
—
2023

Powerbeats Fit

Pros
  • +Heart-rate monitoring during workouts
  • +Wingtip stability for running
  • +IPX4 sweat/water resistance
Cons
  • −No ANC (Beats Fit Pro had it)
  • −Charging case lacks Qi wireless
  • −Mainly an Apple-ecosystem play

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

Pros
  • +Compact carry
  • +Platform integration (brand-dependent)
  • +Quick pair
Cons
  • −Battery life limited
  • −Fit varies by ear
  • −Case bulkier than pod

FAQ: Powerbeats Fit vs Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case

Which is better, Powerbeats Fit or Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case? +

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Powerbeats Fit worth the price? +

At $199, Powerbeats Fit delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in comfort.

Is Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case worth the price? +

At $299, Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in sound.

Does Powerbeats Fit or Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for comfort, Powerbeats Fit or Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case? +

Powerbeats Fit — leads on comfort (92 vs 90). Compared on the comfort sub-score.

Which is better for sound, Powerbeats Fit or Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case? +

Bose QC Ultra Earbuds · standard case — leads on sound (91 vs 88). Compared on the sound sub-score.