NZXT
NZXT C850 Gold
850 W · Gold
85
/ 100
From $149
VS
Seasonic Focus GX-850 wins by 3
Seasonic
Seasonic Focus GX-850
850 W · Gold
88
/ 100
From $149
Specdex verdict
Seasonic Focus GX-850 takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, NZXT C850 Gold lands at 85 and Seasonic Focus GX-850 at 88. That puts Seasonic Focus GX-850 ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick NZXT C850 Gold if…
- ✓Modular cabling on most
- ✓ATX 3.1 / 12V-2x6 support
- ✓10-year warranty on many
Pick Seasonic Focus GX-850 if…
- ✓Modular cabling on most
- ✓ATX 3.1 / 12V-2x6 support
- ✓10-year warranty on many
NZXT C850 Gold 85
vs 88 Seasonic Focus GX-850
Score breakdown
NZXT C850 Gold
85 efficiency 85
noise 86
cables 86
value 84
Seasonic Focus GX-850
88 efficiency 88
noise 86
cables 86
value 84
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | NZXT C850 Gold | Seasonic Focus GX-850 |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage | 850 W | 850 W |
| Efficiency | Gold | Gold |
NZXT C850 Gold
Pros
- +Modular cabling on most
- +ATX 3.1 / 12V-2x6 support
- +10-year warranty on many
Cons
- −Bulky on higher wattages
- −Fan noise varies by load
- −Cable length may not fit some cases
Seasonic Focus GX-850
Pros
- +Modular cabling on most
- +ATX 3.1 / 12V-2x6 support
- +10-year warranty on many
Cons
- −Bulky on higher wattages
- −Fan noise varies by load
- −Cable length may not fit some cases
FAQ: NZXT C850 Gold vs Seasonic Focus GX-850
Which is better, NZXT C850 Gold or Seasonic Focus GX-850? +
Seasonic Focus GX-850 scores 88 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is NZXT C850 Gold worth the price? +
At $149, NZXT C850 Gold delivers a Specdex score of 85 — strongest in noise.
Is Seasonic Focus GX-850 worth the price? +
At $149, Seasonic Focus GX-850 delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in efficiency.
Does NZXT C850 Gold or Seasonic Focus GX-850 last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.