Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z9 · Body only — full-frame · 2021
Nikon

Nikon Z9 · Body only

full-frame · 2021

94
/ 100
From $5,499
VS
Canon EOS R5 Mark II wins by 1
Canon EOS R5 Mark II — 45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection
Canon

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

45 MP stacked · 8K60 RAW · AI detection

95
/ 100
From $4,299
Specdex verdict

Canon EOS R5 Mark II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z9 · Body only lands at 94 and Canon EOS R5 Mark II at 95. That puts Canon EOS R5 Mark II ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z9 · Body only if…

  • Current-gen AF system
  • Proven lens ecosystem
  • Strong video + stills balance

Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if…

  • 8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Photo

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the photo sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on photo (96 vs 94).

Autofocus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on autofocus (98 vs 92).

Video

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Compared on the video sub-score

Canon EOS R5 Mark II leads on video (96 vs 90).

Value for money

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Canon EOS R5 Mark II more score per dollar ($4,299 vs $5,499).

Nikon Z9 · Body only 94
vs
95 Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Score breakdown

Nikon Z9 · Body only
94
photo 94
video 90
autofocus 92
ergonomics 86
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
95
photo 96
video 96
autofocus 98
ergonomics 92

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z9 · Body only versus Canon EOS R5 Mark II — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z9 · Body only Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Format
full-frame
Release year
2021
Sensor
45 MP BSI stacked CMOS
Mount
Canon RF
Burst
12 fps mechanical / 30 fps electronic
Video
8K 60p RAW · 4K 120p
AF
5,850 user-selectable points, 100% coverage
ISO
100–51200 (exp. 50–102400)
Stabilization
5-axis IBIS

Nikon Z9 · Body only

Pros
  • +Current-gen AF system
  • +Proven lens ecosystem
  • +Strong video + stills balance
Cons
  • Body price excludes lens
  • Heavy for travel (flagship)
  • Learning curve on menus

Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Pros
  • +8K 60p RAW internal recording
  • +Next-gen AI subject detection (5,850 AF points, 100% coverage)
  • +Up to 30 fps electronic burst
Cons
  • Price jumped from R5
  • Body heats in extended 8K recording
  • Battery life modest

FAQ: Nikon Z9 · Body only vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II

Which is better, Nikon Z9 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z9 · Body only worth the price? +

At $5,499, Nikon Z9 · Body only delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in photo.

Is Canon EOS R5 Mark II worth the price? +

At $4,299, Canon EOS R5 Mark II delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in autofocus.

Does Nikon Z9 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for photo, Nikon Z9 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on photo (96 vs 94). Compared on the photo sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Nikon Z9 · Body only or Canon EOS R5 Mark II? +

Canon EOS R5 Mark II — leads on autofocus (98 vs 92). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.