Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — Telephoto zoom · VR · 1360 g
Nikon

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Telephoto zoom · VR · 1360 g

95
/ 100
From $2,699
VS
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins by 3
Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD — Prime/Zoom
Tamron

Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD

Prime/Zoom

92
/ 100
From $1,899
Specdex verdict

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S lands at 95 and Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD at 92. That puts Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

  • ✓Tack-sharp across range
  • ✓Excellent VR stabilization
  • ✓Teleconverter compatible

Pick Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the build sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on build (98 vs 94).

Sharpness

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on sharpness (98 vs 92).

Autofocus

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on af (94 vs 91).

Value for money

Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD more score per dollar ($1,899 vs $2,699).

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S 95
vs
92 Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
95
sharpness 98
af 94
build 98
value 86
Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD
92
sharpness 92
af 91
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S versus Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD
Mount
Nikon Z
—
Aperture
f/2.8
—
Weight
1360 g
—
Filter size
77 mm
—

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Pros
  • +Tack-sharp across range
  • +Excellent VR stabilization
  • +Teleconverter compatible
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Pricey
  • −Handholding with TC challenging

Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S vs Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD

Which is better, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S worth the price? +

At $2,699, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD worth the price? +

At $1,899, Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on build (98 vs 94). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S or Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8 Di III VXD? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on sharpness (98 vs 92). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.