Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $849
VS
Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — Prime/zoom
Sigma

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Prime/zoom

88
/ 100
From $2,000
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S lands at 88 and Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports at 88. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Compared on the build sub-score

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports leads on build (90 vs 88).

Sharpness

Tie

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Autofocus

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S leads on af (86 vs 84).

Value for money

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S more score per dollar ($849 vs $2,000).

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S 88
vs
88 Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85
Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports
88
sharpness 88
af 84
build 90
value 86

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S versus Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

FAQ: Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S vs Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Which is better, Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Both score 88 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S worth the price? +

At $849, Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports worth the price? +

At $2,000, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — leads on build (90 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Nikon Z 35mm f/1.8 S — leads on af (86 vs 84). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.