Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,099
VS
Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II wins by 2
Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II — Prime/Zoom
Sony

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Prime/Zoom

90
/ 100
From $1,698
Specdex verdict

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S lands at 88 and Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II at 90. That puts Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Compared on the build sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II leads on build (94 vs 88).

Sharpness

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II leads on sharpness (90 vs 88).

Autofocus

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II leads on af (89 vs 86).

Value for money

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $1,698).

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S 88
vs
90 Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85
Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II
90
sharpness 90
af 89
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S versus Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S vs Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II

Which is better, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II scores 90 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S worth the price? +

At $1,099, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II worth the price? +

At $1,698, Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II — leads on build (94 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II? +

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS II — leads on sharpness (90 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.