Skip to content
Specdex
Nikon

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,099
VS
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM wins by 8
Canon

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Full-frame · 950 g · Pro portrait

96
/ 100
From $2,299
Specdex verdict

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S lands at 88 and Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM at 96. That puts Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM ahead by 8 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S if…

  • Fast aperture
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM if…

  • Breathtaking bokeh
  • Sharp wide open
  • Weather-sealed L build

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM
96
sharpness 98
af 94
build 98
value 82

Specs side-by-side

Spec
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM
Mount
Canon RF
Aperture
f/1.2
Weight
950 g
Filter size
77 mm

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Weight varies
  • Price scales with quality

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Pros
  • +Breathtaking bokeh
  • +Sharp wide open
  • +Weather-sealed L build
Cons
  • Heavy at 950 g
  • Expensive
  • Breathing present

FAQ: Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S vs Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM

Which is better, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM? +

Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 8. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S worth the price? +

At $1,099, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM worth the price? +

At $2,299, Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.