Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Prime/Zoom

88
/ 100
From $1,099
VS
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM wins by 8
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Prime/Zoom

96
/ 100
From $2,999
Specdex verdict

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S lands at 88 and Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM at 96. That puts Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM ahead by 8 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S if…

  • ✓Fast aperture
  • ✓Quiet autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on sharpness (96 vs 88).

Build

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the build sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on build (94 vs 88).

Autofocus

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM leads on af (95 vs 86).

Value for money

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $2,999).

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S 88
vs
96 Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
88
sharpness 88
af 86
build 88
value 85
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM
96
sharpness 96
af 95
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S versus Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Weight varies
  • −Price scales with quality

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S vs Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM

Which is better, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM scores 96 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 8. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S worth the price? +

At $1,099, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM worth the price? +

At $2,999, Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM delivers a Specdex score of 96 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — leads on sharpness (96 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S or Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM? +

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM — leads on build (94 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.