Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S

Prime/Zoom

94
/ 100
From $2,399
VS
Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S wins by 3
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — Prime/Zoom
Sigma

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $1,499
Specdex verdict

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S lands at 94 and Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art at 91. That puts Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S if…

  • Fast autofocus
  • Weather-sealed
  • Premium optics

Pick Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art if…

  • Fast autofocus
  • Weather-sealed
  • Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Sharpness

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S leads on sharpness (94 vs 91).

Autofocus

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S leads on af (93 vs 90).

Value for money

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art more score per dollar ($1,499 vs $2,399).

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S 94
vs
91 Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S
94
sharpness 94
af 93
build 94
value 84
Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art
91
sharpness 91
af 90
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S versus Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Focus breathing varies

Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S vs Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art

Which is better, Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S scores 94 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S worth the price? +

At $2,399, Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art worth the price? +

At $1,499, Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S — leads on sharpness (94 vs 91). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S or Sigma 35-150mm f/2-2.8 DG DN Art? +

Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S — leads on af (93 vs 90). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.