Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $2,699
VS
Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S wins by 3
Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — Prime/zoom
Sigma

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Prime/zoom

88
/ 100
From $2,000
Specdex verdict

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S lands at 91 and Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports at 88. That puts Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S if…

  • Fast aperture
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports if…

  • Proven optical formula
  • Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • Strong resale
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S leads on sharpness (91 vs 88).

Build

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Compared on the build sub-score

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports leads on build (90 vs 88).

Autofocus

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S leads on af (89 vs 84).

Value for money

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports more score per dollar ($2,000 vs $2,699).

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 91
vs
88 Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
91
sharpness 91
af 89
build 88
value 85
Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports
88
sharpness 88
af 84
build 90
value 86

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S versus Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Weight varies
  • Price scales with quality

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Older AF motor on some
  • Heavier than modern counterparts

FAQ: Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S vs Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports

Which is better, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S scores 91 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S worth the price? +

At $2,699, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports worth the price? +

At $2,000, Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports delivers a Specdex score of 88 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S — leads on sharpness (91 vs 88). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for build, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports? +

Sigma 60-600mm DG DN OS Sports — leads on build (90 vs 88). Compared on the build sub-score.