Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Prime/Zoom

91
/ 100
From $2,699
VS
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S wins by 4
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — Prime/Zoom
Nikon

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Prime/Zoom

95
/ 100
From $2,699
Specdex verdict

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S lands at 91 and Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S at 95. That puts Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S if…

  • Fast aperture
  • Quiet autofocus
  • Weather-sealed (most)

Pick Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S if…

  • Fast autofocus
  • Weather-sealed
  • Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on sharpness (95 vs 91).

Autofocus

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on af (94 vs 89).

Build

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Compared on the build sub-score

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S leads on build (94 vs 88).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S 91
vs
95 Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Score breakdown

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
91
sharpness 91
af 89
build 88
value 85
Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
95
sharpness 95
af 94
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S versus Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

Pros
  • +Fast aperture
  • +Quiet autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed (most)
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Weight varies
  • Price scales with quality

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • Heavy
  • Expensive
  • Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S vs Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S

Which is better, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S worth the price? +

At $2,699, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S worth the price? +

At $2,699, Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on sharpness (95 vs 91). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for autofocus, Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S or Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S? +

Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — leads on af (94 vs 89). Compared on the autofocus sub-score.