Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR — Prime/zoom
Nikon

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Prime/zoom

92
/ 100
From $2,799
VS
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art wins by 1
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — L/E mount · Constant f/2.8 · 745g
Sigma

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

L/E mount · Constant f/2.8 · 745g

93
/ 100
From $1,099
Specdex verdict

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR lands at 92 and Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art at 93. That puts Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR if…

  • Proven optical formula
  • Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • Strong resale

Pick Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art if…

  • Sharper than first-party Sony GM at 1/3 the price
  • Aperture ring with click toggle
  • Weather-sealed
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Sharpness

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art leads on sharpness (95 vs 92).

Build

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Compared on the build sub-score

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art leads on build (92 vs 90).

Autofocus

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art leads on af (92 vs 88).

Value for money

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art more score per dollar ($1,099 vs $2,799).

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR 92
vs
93 Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Score breakdown

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR
92
sharpness 92
af 88
build 90
value 86
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art
93
sharpness 95
af 92
build 92
value 95

Specs side-by-side

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR versus Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art
Mount
L-Mount + Sony E
Focal length
24-70 mm
Aperture
f/2.8
Construction
19 elements / 15 groups
Min focus
0.18 m
Filter
82 mm
Weight
745 g

Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • Mount-specific
  • Older AF motor on some
  • Heavier than modern counterparts

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Pros
  • +Sharper than first-party Sony GM at 1/3 the price
  • +Aperture ring with click toggle
  • +Weather-sealed
Cons
  • Heavier than Sony GM II
  • Not stabilized — relies on body IBIS
  • Hood plastic

FAQ: Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR vs Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art

Which is better, Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR worth the price? +

At $2,799, Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art worth the price? +

At $1,099, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in sharpness.

Does Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — leads on sharpness (95 vs 92). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.

Which is better for build, Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR or Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art? +

Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN II Art — leads on build (92 vs 90). Compared on the build sub-score.