Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR — Prime/zoom
Nikon

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR

Prime/zoom

90
/ 100
From $2,399
VS
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM wins by 3
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM — Prime/Zoom
Canon

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Prime/Zoom

93
/ 100
From $2,299
Specdex verdict

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR lands at 90 and Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM at 93. That puts Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM ahead by 3 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR if…

  • ✓Proven optical formula
  • ✓Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • ✓Strong resale

Pick Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM if…

  • ✓Fast autofocus
  • ✓Weather-sealed
  • ✓Premium optics
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Compared on the build sub-score

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM leads on build (94 vs 90).

Sharpness

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Compared on the sharpness sub-score

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM leads on sharpness (93 vs 90).

Autofocus

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Compared on the autofocus sub-score

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM leads on af (92 vs 86).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR 90
vs
93 Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Score breakdown

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR
90
sharpness 90
af 86
build 90
value 86
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM
93
sharpness 93
af 92
build 94
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR versus Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM — full spec comparison
Spec Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR

Pros
  • +Proven optical formula
  • +Weather-sealing (L/GM/S)
  • +Strong resale
Cons
  • −Mount-specific
  • −Older AF motor on some
  • −Heavier than modern counterparts

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Pros
  • +Fast autofocus
  • +Weather-sealed
  • +Premium optics
Cons
  • −Heavy
  • −Expensive
  • −Focus breathing varies

FAQ: Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR vs Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM

Which is better, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR or Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM? +

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 3. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR worth the price? +

At $2,399, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in sharpness.

Is Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM worth the price? +

At $2,299, Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in build.

Does Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR or Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for build, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR or Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM? +

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM — leads on build (94 vs 90). Compared on the build sub-score.

Which is better for sharpness, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR or Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM? +

Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM — leads on sharpness (93 vs 90). Compared on the sharpness sub-score.