Logitech
Logitech C922 Pro
1080p
78
/ 100
From $99
VS
Elgato Facecam MK.2 wins by 9
Elgato
Elgato Facecam MK.2
1080p60 · Sony STARVIS 2 · Creator-focused
87
/ 100
From $149
Specdex verdict
Elgato Facecam MK.2 takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, Logitech C922 Pro lands at 78 and Elgato Facecam MK.2 at 87. That puts Elgato Facecam MK.2 ahead by 9 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick Logitech C922 Pro if…
- ✓USB-C connectivity (modern)
- ✓Auto framing (some)
- ✓Software tuning
Pick Elgato Facecam MK.2 if…
- ✓Excellent low-light
- ✓Full manual control in Camera Hub
- ✓Fixed-focus = no hunting
Logitech C922 Pro 78
vs 87 Elgato Facecam MK.2
Score breakdown
Logitech C922 Pro
78 image 76
features 78
build 86
value 82
Elgato Facecam MK.2
87 image 90
features 86
build 90
value 82
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | Logitech C922 Pro | Elgato Facecam MK.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080p | 1080p60 |
| Sensor | — | Sony STARVIS 2 |
| Connectivity | — | USB-C |
Logitech C922 Pro
Pros
- +USB-C connectivity (modern)
- +Auto framing (some)
- +Software tuning
Cons
- −Fixed focal length on most
- −Low-light varies wildly
- −Mounting can be fiddly
Elgato Facecam MK.2
Pros
- +Excellent low-light
- +Full manual control in Camera Hub
- +Fixed-focus = no hunting
Cons
- −No 4K (1080p60 ceiling)
- −No built-in mic
- −Pricey for 1080p
FAQ: Logitech C922 Pro vs Elgato Facecam MK.2
Which is better, Logitech C922 Pro or Elgato Facecam MK.2? +
Elgato Facecam MK.2 scores 87 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 9. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is Logitech C922 Pro worth the price? +
At $99, Logitech C922 Pro delivers a Specdex score of 78 — strongest in build.
Is Elgato Facecam MK.2 worth the price? +
At $149, Elgato Facecam MK.2 delivers a Specdex score of 87 — strongest in image.
Does Logitech C922 Pro or Elgato Facecam MK.2 last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.