LG
LG 27GR95QE
27″ · 1440p OLED · 240Hz
91
/ 100
From $999
VS
Alienware AW3225QF wins by 2
Alienware
Alienware AW3225QF
32″ 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz · Curved
93
/ 100
From $1,199
Specdex verdict
Alienware AW3225QF takes it — here’s why.
In our weighted Specdex score, LG 27GR95QE lands at 91 and Alienware AW3225QF at 93. That puts Alienware AW3225QF ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.
Pick LG 27GR95QE if…
- ✓Current panel tech
- ✓Strong factory calibration
- ✓Modern connectivity
Pick Alienware AW3225QF if…
- ✓4K 240Hz QD-OLED
- ✓Dolby Vision HDR
- ✓Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
LG 27GR95QE 91
vs 93 Alienware AW3225QF
Score breakdown
LG 27GR95QE
91 color 91
motion 96
hdr 92
features 89
Alienware AW3225QF
93 color 96
motion 98
hdr 94
features 92
Specs side-by-side
| Spec | LG 27GR95QE | Alienware AW3225QF |
|---|---|---|
| Panel | 1440p OLED | QD-OLED |
| Size | 27" | — |
| Refresh | 240Hz | 240Hz |
| Release year | 2023 | — |
| Resolution | — | 3840×2160 |
| Connectivity | — | DP 1.4, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 90W |
LG 27GR95QE
Pros
- +Current panel tech
- +Strong factory calibration
- +Modern connectivity
Cons
- −Stand footprint large on bigger sizes
- −HDR varies by model
- −OLED burn-in risk
Alienware AW3225QF
Pros
- +4K 240Hz QD-OLED
- +Dolby Vision HDR
- +Excellent HDR brightness for OLED
Cons
- −Curve isn’t for everyone
- −OLED burn-in risk
- −Stand large
FAQ: LG 27GR95QE vs Alienware AW3225QF
Which is better, LG 27GR95QE or Alienware AW3225QF? +
Alienware AW3225QF scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.
Is LG 27GR95QE worth the price? +
At $999, LG 27GR95QE delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in motion.
Is Alienware AW3225QF worth the price? +
At $1,199, Alienware AW3225QF delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in motion.
Does LG 27GR95QE or Alienware AW3225QF last longer? +
Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.