Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB — 2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #44
Lexar

Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB

2TB · PCIe 5.0 NVMe · 14,000 MB/s read · PassMark #44

75
/ 100
From $225
VS
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare wins by 11
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB
Samsung

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

PCIe 3.0 · 3500/3300 MB/s · 2TB

86
/ 100
From $140
Specdex verdict

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB lands at 75 and Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare at 86. That puts Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare ahead by 11 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB if…

  • Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #44
  • Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput

Pick Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare if…

  • M.2 NVMe
  • Competitive per-GB cost
  • TBW scales with capacity
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Value for money

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare more score per dollar ($140 vs $225).

Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB 75
vs
86 Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Score breakdown

Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB
75
ssd 75
passmark_disk 79270
read 0
write 0
endurance 0
value 0
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare
86
ssd 0
passmark_disk 0
read 90
write 88
endurance 88
value 84

Specs side-by-side

Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB versus Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — full spec comparison
Spec Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare
Form factor
M.2 2280
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe 2.0
PCIe 3.0
Sequential read
14,000 MB/s
Sequential write
13,000 MB/s
Random read
2,100,000 IOPS
Random write
2,000,000 IOPS
Controller
Silicon Motion SM2508 (6nm)
NAND
232-layer Micron B58R 3D TLC
DRAM
yes, ~1GB LPDDR4X per TB
Endurance
1,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
PassMark Disk Score
79,270
PassMark rank
#44 of 100 consumer SSDs
Capacity
2TB
Read/Write
3500/3300 MB/s

Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB

Pros
  • +Strong PCIe 5.0 performance at PassMark rank #44
  • +Pro-tier controller and DRAM cache for sustained throughput
Cons
  • DRAM-less controllers on lower-tier variants may throttle under sustained writes
  • Pricing varies — confirm current retail before purchase

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Pros
  • +M.2 NVMe
  • +Competitive per-GB cost
  • +TBW scales with capacity
Cons
  • Thermals on Gen 5 drives
  • DRAM-less models slower under sustained load
  • Require heatsinks in many systems

FAQ: Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB vs Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare

Which is better, Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB or Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 11. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB worth the price? +

At $225, Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB delivers a Specdex score of 75 — strongest in passmark_disk.

Is Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare worth the price? +

At $140, Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in read.

Does Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB or Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is the better value, Lexar SSD NM1090 PRO 2TB or Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare? +

Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB · bare — more score per dollar ($140 vs $225). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.