Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular — M5 · Tandem OLED · Wi-Fi + Cellular
Apple

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular

M5 · Tandem OLED · Wi-Fi + Cellular

95
/ 100
From $1,499
VS
iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular wins by 11
reMarkable Paper Pro — 11.8″ color E Ink · Pen · Note-first
reMarkable

reMarkable Paper Pro

11.8″ color E Ink · Pen · Note-first

84
/ 100
From $579
Specdex verdict

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular lands at 95 and reMarkable Paper Pro at 84. That puts iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular ahead by 11 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular if…

  • M5 performance in a tablet
  • Tandem OLED display
  • Apple Pencil Pro support

Pick reMarkable Paper Pro if…

  • Paper-like writing feel
  • Color E Ink (Canvas Color)
  • Distraction-free by design
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Display

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular

Compared on the display sub-score

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular leads on display (98 vs 88).

Battery

reMarkable Paper Pro

Compared on the battery sub-score

reMarkable Paper Pro leads on battery (94 vs 88).

Portability

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular

Compared on the portability sub-score

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular leads on portability (92 vs 90).

Value for money

reMarkable Paper Pro

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

reMarkable Paper Pro more score per dollar ($579 vs $1,499).

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular 95
vs
84 reMarkable Paper Pro

Score breakdown

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular
95
performance 97
display 98
battery 88
portability 92
software 82
reMarkable Paper Pro
84
performance 72
display 88
battery 94
portability 90
software 74

Specs side-by-side

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular versus reMarkable Paper Pro — full spec comparison
Spec iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular reMarkable Paper Pro
Chip
M5
Display size
13"
Storage
256GB
64 GB
Connectivity
Wi-Fi + Cellular
Release year
2025
Display
11.8″ Canvas Color E Ink
Weight
525 g
Stylus
Included with Bundle

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular

Pros
  • +M5 performance in a tablet
  • +Tandem OLED display
  • +Apple Pencil Pro support
Cons
  • iPadOS multitasking still limited
  • Keyboard sold separately
  • Pricey for casual use

reMarkable Paper Pro

Pros
  • +Paper-like writing feel
  • +Color E Ink (Canvas Color)
  • +Distraction-free by design
Cons
  • Closed ecosystem
  • Expensive pen bundle
  • Subscription for cloud sync

FAQ: iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular vs reMarkable Paper Pro

Which is better, iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular or reMarkable Paper Pro? +

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular scores 95 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 11. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular worth the price? +

At $1,499, iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular delivers a Specdex score of 95 — strongest in display.

Is reMarkable Paper Pro worth the price? +

At $579, reMarkable Paper Pro delivers a Specdex score of 84 — strongest in battery.

Does iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular or reMarkable Paper Pro last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for display, iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular or reMarkable Paper Pro? +

iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular — leads on display (98 vs 88). Compared on the display sub-score.

Which is better for battery, iPad Pro 13" (M5) · 256GB · Wi-Fi + Cellular or reMarkable Paper Pro? +

reMarkable Paper Pro — leads on battery (94 vs 88). Compared on the battery sub-score.