Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz

93
/ 100
From $649
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K wins by 1
Threadripper Pro 5995WX — Zen 3 · 64C/128T · sWRX8
AMD

Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Zen 3 · 64C/128T · sWRX8

92
/ 100
From $6,499
Specdex verdict

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K lands at 93 and Threadripper Pro 5995WX at 92. That puts Intel Core Ultra 9 395K ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Intel Core Ultra 9 395K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set

Pick Threadripper Pro 5995WX if…

  • Massive core counts
  • ECC memory support
  • Workstation/server-grade platform
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on gaming (94 vs 72).

Creators & productivity

Tie

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on efficiency (86 vs 78).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K more score per dollar ($649 vs $6,499).

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K 93
vs
92 Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Score breakdown

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
93
single 95
multi 93
gaming 94
efficiency 86
Threadripper Pro 5995WX
92
single 84
multi 92
gaming 72
efficiency 78

Specs side-by-side

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K versus Threadripper Pro 5995WX — full spec comparison
Spec Intel Core Ultra 9 395K Threadripper Pro 5995WX
Architecture
Panther Lake
Zen 3
Cores
26 (8P+16E+2LP)
64
Threads
26
128
Socket
LGA1851
sWRX8
Release year
2025
2022

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Pros
  • +Massive core counts
  • +ECC memory support
  • +Workstation/server-grade platform
Cons
  • Niche platform, limited motherboards
  • High TDP requires serious cooling
  • Premium price

FAQ: Intel Core Ultra 9 395K vs Threadripper Pro 5995WX

Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Threadripper Pro 5995WX? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K scores 93 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 395K worth the price? +

At $649, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Is Threadripper Pro 5995WX worth the price? +

At $6,499, Threadripper Pro 5995WX delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in multi.

Does Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Threadripper Pro 5995WX last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Threadripper Pro 5995WX? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on gaming (94 vs 72). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for power efficiency, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Threadripper Pro 5995WX? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on efficiency (86 vs 78). Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost.