Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Panther Lake · 26C · 6.0 GHz

93
/ 100
From $649
VS
Apple M5 wins by 1
Apple M5 — 10C CPU · 10C GPU · Next-gen NPU
Apple

Apple M5

10C CPU · 10C GPU · Next-gen NPU

94
/ 100
From $1,299
Specdex verdict

Apple M5 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K lands at 93 and Apple M5 at 94. That puts Apple M5 ahead by 1 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Intel Core Ultra 9 395K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set

Pick Apple M5 if…

  • Perf-per-watt improved ~18% vs M4
  • Enhanced ray tracing
  • 16-core Neural Engine v5 (50 TOPS)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on gaming (94 vs 78).

Creators & productivity

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K leads on multi (93 vs 90).

Power efficiency

Apple M5

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Apple M5 leads on efficiency (100 vs 86).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K more score per dollar ($649 vs $1,299).

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K 93
vs
94 Apple M5

Score breakdown

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K
93
single 95
multi 93
gaming 94
efficiency 86
Apple M5
94
single 100
multi 90
gaming 78
efficiency 100

Specs side-by-side

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K versus Apple M5 — full spec comparison
Spec Intel Core Ultra 9 395K Apple M5
Architecture
Panther Lake
Cores
26 (8P+16E+2LP)
10 (4P+6E)
Threads
26
Socket
LGA1851
Release year
2025
Memory bandwidth
150 GB/s
Neural engine
16-core, 50 TOPS
Process
TSMC N3P

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

Apple M5

Pros
  • +Perf-per-watt improved ~18% vs M4
  • +Enhanced ray tracing
  • +16-core Neural Engine v5 (50 TOPS)
Cons
  • Apple-ecosystem only
  • Limited to first-party products
  • No Windows gaming story

FAQ: Intel Core Ultra 9 395K vs Apple M5

Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Apple M5? +

Apple M5 scores 94 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 1. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Intel Core Ultra 9 395K worth the price? +

At $649, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K delivers a Specdex score of 93 — strongest in single.

Is Apple M5 worth the price? +

At $1,299, Apple M5 delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in single.

Does Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Apple M5 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Apple M5? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on gaming (94 vs 78). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Intel Core Ultra 9 395K or Apple M5? +

Intel Core Ultra 9 395K — leads on multi (93 vs 90). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.