Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Intel Core Ultra 7 365K — Panther Lake · 22C · 5.8 GHz
Intel

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K

Panther Lake · 22C · 5.8 GHz

89
/ 100
From $429
VS
Core Ultra 9 285K — Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

Arrow Lake · 24C · 5.7 GHz · LGA1851

89
/ 100
From $589
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Intel Core Ultra 7 365K lands at 89 and Core Ultra 9 285K at 89. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Intel Core Ultra 7 365K if…

  • Latest generation silicon
  • Improved perf-per-watt
  • Full modern feature set

Pick Core Ultra 9 285K if…

  • Far more efficient than 14900K
  • Strong multi-thread productivity
  • New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Gaming

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K

Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K leads on gaming (90 vs 85).

Creators & productivity

Core Ultra 9 285K

Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count

Core Ultra 9 285K leads on multi (94 vs 89).

Power efficiency

Core Ultra 9 285K

Performance per watt — thermals, PSU headroom, electricity cost

Core Ultra 9 285K leads on efficiency (90 vs 86).

Value for money

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K more score per dollar ($429 vs $589).

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K 89
vs
89 Core Ultra 9 285K

Score breakdown

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K
89
single 91
multi 89
gaming 90
efficiency 86
Core Ultra 9 285K
89
single 92
multi 94
gaming 85
efficiency 90

Specs side-by-side

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K versus Core Ultra 9 285K — full spec comparison
Spec Intel Core Ultra 7 365K Core Ultra 9 285K
Architecture
Panther Lake
Cores
22 (8P+12E+2LP)
24 (8P + 16E)
Socket
LGA1851
LGA1851
Release year
2025
Threads
24
Base clock
3.7 GHz
Boost clock
5.7 GHz
L3 cache
36 MB
TDP
125 W (PL1) / 250 W (PL2)
Process
TSMC N3B
iGPU
Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG, 4 Xe cores @ 2.0 GHz)
NPU
13 TOPS
Memory
DDR5-6400

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K

Pros
  • +Latest generation silicon
  • +Improved perf-per-watt
  • +Full modern feature set
Cons
  • Premium pricing
  • Requires up-to-date platform
  • Initial stock scarcity likely

Core Ultra 9 285K

Pros
  • +Far more efficient than 14900K
  • +Strong multi-thread productivity
  • +New LGA1851 platform with DDR5-6400
Cons
  • Gaming regresses vs 14900K in some titles
  • No hyper-threading (24 threads from 24 cores)
  • 13 TOPS NPU is modest

FAQ: Intel Core Ultra 7 365K vs Core Ultra 9 285K

Which is better, Intel Core Ultra 7 365K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Both score 89 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Intel Core Ultra 7 365K worth the price? +

At $429, Intel Core Ultra 7 365K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in single.

Is Core Ultra 9 285K worth the price? +

At $589, Core Ultra 9 285K delivers a Specdex score of 89 — strongest in multi.

Does Intel Core Ultra 7 365K or Core Ultra 9 285K last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for gaming, Intel Core Ultra 7 365K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Intel Core Ultra 7 365K — leads on gaming (90 vs 85). Frame-rate-bound workloads — favours cache and single-thread speed.

Which is better for creator and productivity work, Intel Core Ultra 7 365K or Core Ultra 9 285K? +

Core Ultra 9 285K — leads on multi (94 vs 89). Rendering, compilation, heavy multitasking — favours core count.