Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
HyperX QuadCast S — Condenser USB
HyperX

HyperX QuadCast S

Condenser USB

82
/ 100
From $149
VS
Audio-Technica AT2035 wins by 4
Audio-Technica AT2035 — Condenser XLR
Audio-Technica

Audio-Technica AT2035

Condenser XLR

86
/ 100
From $169
Specdex verdict

Audio-Technica AT2035 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, HyperX QuadCast S lands at 82 and Audio-Technica AT2035 at 86. That puts Audio-Technica AT2035 ahead by 4 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick HyperX QuadCast S if…

  • Well-known professional reputation
  • Good rejection (dynamic)
  • Plug-and-play USB (where applicable)

Pick Audio-Technica AT2035 if…

  • Well-known professional reputation
  • Good rejection (dynamic)
  • Plug-and-play USB (where applicable)
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Build

Tie

Compared on the build sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Sound

Audio-Technica AT2035

Compared on the sound sub-score

Audio-Technica AT2035 leads on sound (86 vs 82).

Features

Audio-Technica AT2035

Compared on the features sub-score

Audio-Technica AT2035 leads on features (82 vs 78).

Value for money

Tie

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Effectively tied — similar score-per-dollar at MSRP.

HyperX QuadCast S 82
vs
86 Audio-Technica AT2035

Score breakdown

HyperX QuadCast S
82
sound 82
features 78
build 90
value 84
Audio-Technica AT2035
86
sound 86
features 82
build 90
value 84

Specs side-by-side

HyperX QuadCast S versus Audio-Technica AT2035 — full spec comparison
Spec HyperX QuadCast S Audio-Technica AT2035
Type
Condenser USB
Condenser XLR

HyperX QuadCast S

Pros
  • +Well-known professional reputation
  • +Good rejection (dynamic)
  • +Plug-and-play USB (where applicable)
Cons
  • XLR models need an interface
  • Shock mount often extra
  • Room treatment helps more than mic choice

Audio-Technica AT2035

Pros
  • +Well-known professional reputation
  • +Good rejection (dynamic)
  • +Plug-and-play USB (where applicable)
Cons
  • XLR models need an interface
  • Shock mount often extra
  • Room treatment helps more than mic choice

FAQ: HyperX QuadCast S vs Audio-Technica AT2035

Which is better, HyperX QuadCast S or Audio-Technica AT2035? +

Audio-Technica AT2035 scores 86 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 4. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is HyperX QuadCast S worth the price? +

At $149, HyperX QuadCast S delivers a Specdex score of 82 — strongest in build.

Is Audio-Technica AT2035 worth the price? +

At $169, Audio-Technica AT2035 delivers a Specdex score of 86 — strongest in build.

Does HyperX QuadCast S or Audio-Technica AT2035 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for sound, HyperX QuadCast S or Audio-Technica AT2035? +

Audio-Technica AT2035 — leads on sound (86 vs 82). Compared on the sound sub-score.

Which is better for features, HyperX QuadCast S or Audio-Technica AT2035? +

Audio-Technica AT2035 — leads on features (82 vs 78). Compared on the features sub-score.