Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
GeForce GTX 1650 — Turing · 4 GB GDDR5 · 75 W
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

Turing · 4 GB GDDR5 · 75 W

55
/ 100
From $149
VS
EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 wins by 37
EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 — Ada · 16 GB GDDR6X · 320 W · FTW3
EVGA

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Ada · 16 GB GDDR6X · 320 W · FTW3

92
/ 100
From $1,344
Specdex verdict

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, GeForce GTX 1650 lands at 55 and EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 at 92. That puts EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 ahead by 37 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick GeForce GTX 1650 if…

  • ✓NVIDIA driver stack
  • ✓DLSS support on RTX
  • ✓Strong resale value

Pick EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 if…

  • ✓NVIDIA driver stack
  • ✓DLSS support on RTX
  • ✓Strong resale value
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

4K & rasterization

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 leads on raster (92 vs 55).

Ray tracing

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 leads on rt (87 vs 50).

AI workloads

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Local inference, upscaling, generative tools

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 leads on ai (89 vs 52).

Power efficiency

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Frames per watt — heat, noise, and PSU sizing

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 leads on efficiency (73 vs 70).

Value for money

GeForce GTX 1650

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

GeForce GTX 1650 more score per dollar ($149 vs $1,344).

GeForce GTX 1650 55
vs
92 EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Score breakdown

GeForce GTX 1650
55
raster 55
rt 50
ai 52
efficiency 70
EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080
92
raster 92
rt 87
ai 89
efficiency 73

Specs side-by-side

GeForce GTX 1650 versus EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 — full spec comparison
Spec GeForce GTX 1650 EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080
Architecture
Turing
Ada
VRAM
4 GB GDDR5
▲ 16 GB GDDR6X
TBP
75 W
320 W
Release year
2019
2022

GeForce GTX 1650

Pros
  • +NVIDIA driver stack
  • +DLSS support on RTX
  • +Strong resale value
Cons
  • −Power draw scales with tier
  • −Gen-over-gen price creep
  • −VRAM gated per tier

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Pros
  • +NVIDIA driver stack
  • +DLSS support on RTX
  • +Strong resale value
Cons
  • −Power draw scales with tier
  • −Gen-over-gen price creep
  • −VRAM gated per tier

FAQ: GeForce GTX 1650 vs EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080

Which is better, GeForce GTX 1650 or EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080? +

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 37. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 worth the price? +

At $149, GeForce GTX 1650 delivers a Specdex score of 55 — strongest in efficiency.

Is EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 worth the price? +

At $1,344, EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in raster.

Does GeForce GTX 1650 or EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for 4K gaming, GeForce GTX 1650 or EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080? +

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 — leads on raster (92 vs 55). Traditional rendering throughput at high resolution.

Which is better for ray tracing, GeForce GTX 1650 or EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080? +

EVGA FTW3 GeForce RTX 4080 — leads on rt (87 vs 50). RT-heavy titles with path-traced lighting.