Skip to content
Specdex
Google

Google Nest Audio

Smart/Portable · $99

78
/ 100
From $99
VS
KEF LS50 Wireless II wins by 16
KEF

KEF LS50 Wireless II

Smart/Portable · $2799

94
/ 100
From $2,799
Specdex verdict

KEF LS50 Wireless II takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Google Nest Audio lands at 78 and KEF LS50 Wireless II at 94. That puts KEF LS50 Wireless II ahead by 16 points — a decisive margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Google Nest Audio if…

  • Easy multi-room with ecosystem
  • App EQ on modern models
  • USB-C/AUX input on some

Pick KEF LS50 Wireless II if…

  • Easy multi-room with ecosystem
  • App EQ on modern models
  • USB-C/AUX input on some

Score breakdown

Google Nest Audio
78
sound 78
features 76
design 88
ecosystem 84
KEF LS50 Wireless II
94
sound 94
features 92
design 88
ecosystem 84

Specs side-by-side

Spec
Google Nest Audio
KEF LS50 Wireless II

Google Nest Audio

Pros
  • +Easy multi-room with ecosystem
  • +App EQ on modern models
  • +USB-C/AUX input on some
Cons
  • Brand ecosystem lock-in
  • Subscription features on some
  • Bass limits at lower sizes

KEF LS50 Wireless II

Pros
  • +Easy multi-room with ecosystem
  • +App EQ on modern models
  • +USB-C/AUX input on some
Cons
  • Brand ecosystem lock-in
  • Subscription features on some
  • Bass limits at lower sizes

FAQ: Google Nest Audio vs KEF LS50 Wireless II

Which is better, Google Nest Audio or KEF LS50 Wireless II? +

KEF LS50 Wireless II scores 94 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 16. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Google Nest Audio worth the price? +

At $99, Google Nest Audio delivers a Specdex score of 78 — strongest in design.

Is KEF LS50 Wireless II worth the price? +

At $2,799, KEF LS50 Wireless II delivers a Specdex score of 94 — strongest in sound.

Does Google Nest Audio or KEF LS50 Wireless II last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.