Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates — $129 · Wireless · Black
Glorious

Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates

$129 · Wireless · Black

91
/ 100
From $154
VS
Pulsar X2V2 — PAW3395 · 53g · Symmetric
Pulsar

Pulsar X2V2

PAW3395 · 53g · Symmetric

91
/ 100
From $99
Specdex verdict

Dead heat — it comes down to priorities.

In our weighted Specdex score, Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates lands at 91 and Pulsar X2V2 at 91. With scores tied, the decision hinges on which sub-scores matter most to you.

Pick Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates if…

  • Modern flagship sensor
  • Lightweight for FPS
  • Good battery life

Pick Pulsar X2V2 if…

  • Sub-$100 ultralight wireless
  • PAW3395 sensor (top-tier)
  • Open-source-style Pulsar Fusion software
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Weight

Pulsar X2V2

Compared on the weight sub-score

Pulsar X2V2 leads on weight (96 vs 88).

Sensor

Tie

Compared on the sensor sub-score

Effectively tied — neither pulls a 2-point weighted lead.

Value for money

Pulsar X2V2

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Pulsar X2V2 more score per dollar ($99 vs $154).

Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates 91
vs
91 Pulsar X2V2

Score breakdown

Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates
91
sensor 91
weight 88
shape 86
battery 86
build 0
software 0
value 0
Pulsar X2V2
91
sensor 92
weight 96
shape 0
battery 0
build 88
software 92
value 100

Specs side-by-side

Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates versus Pulsar X2V2 — full spec comparison
Spec Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates Pulsar X2V2
Release year
2024
Sensor
PixArt PAW3395 (26000 DPI)
Polling
4000 Hz
Buttons
5
Weight
53 g
Battery
70 hr
Connectivity
Pulsar 2.4 GHz, USB-C

Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates

Pros
  • +Modern flagship sensor
  • +Lightweight for FPS
  • +Good battery life
Cons
  • Software quality varies
  • Shape fits specific hand sizes
  • Skates consumable

Pulsar X2V2

Pros
  • +Sub-$100 ultralight wireless
  • +PAW3395 sensor (top-tier)
  • +Open-source-style Pulsar Fusion software
Cons
  • Smaller market presence
  • Skates not pre-installed on coatings
  • Side buttons feel slightly mushy

FAQ: Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates vs Pulsar X2V2

Which is better, Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates or Pulsar X2V2? +

Both score 91 on our weighted rubric — tied. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates worth the price? +

At $154, Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in sensor.

Is Pulsar X2V2 worth the price? +

At $99, Pulsar X2V2 delivers a Specdex score of 91 — strongest in value.

Does Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates or Pulsar X2V2 last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for weight, Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates or Pulsar X2V2? +

Pulsar X2V2 — leads on weight (96 vs 88). Compared on the weight sub-score.

Which is the better value, Glorious Model O 2 Pro (Black) · with glass skates or Pulsar X2V2? +

Pulsar X2V2 — more score per dollar ($99 vs $154). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.