Skip to content
Specdex
Compare now
Gigabyte MO34WQC2 — 34″ ultrawide QD-OLED · 175Hz · DP 1.4
Gigabyte

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

34″ ultrawide QD-OLED · 175Hz · DP 1.4

90
/ 100
From $749
VS
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P wins by 2
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P — 32″ · 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz
Gigabyte

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

32″ · 4K QD-OLED · 240Hz

92
/ 100
From $1,399
Specdex verdict

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P takes it — here’s why.

In our weighted Specdex score, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 lands at 90 and Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P at 92. That puts Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P ahead by 2 points — a narrow margin driven mostly by its strengths in the categories below.

Pick Gigabyte MO34WQC2 if…

  • ✓34″ QD-OLED ultrawide at $749
  • ✓Dual-mode 1080p @ 350Hz
  • ✓Glossy panel reduces grayish tint

Pick Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P if…

  • ✓Current panel tech
  • ✓Strong factory calibration
  • ✓Modern connectivity
Share this comparison: Share to Reddit X / Twitter

Winner by scenario

Derived from the sub-score breakdown · not a separate test

Picture quality

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Color accuracy and HDR performance

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P leads on hdr (92 vs 88).

Value for money

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Specdex score per dollar at MSRP

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 more score per dollar ($749 vs $1,399).

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 90
vs
92 Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Score breakdown

Gigabyte MO34WQC2
90
display 95
motion 92
hdr 88
gaming 95
ergonomics 84
value 92
color 0
features 0
Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
92
display 0
motion 96
hdr 92
gaming 0
ergonomics 0
value 0
color 92
features 90

Specs side-by-side

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 versus Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P — full spec comparison
Spec Gigabyte MO34WQC2 Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P
Display
34″ QD-OLED, 1800R curve
—
Resolution
3440×1440
—
Refresh rate
175 Hz native (350 Hz at 1080p dual mode)
—
Response time
0.03 ms (GtG)
—
HDR
DisplayHDR True Black 400
—
Connectivity
2× HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4 DSC, USB-C 18W
—
Panel
—
4K QD-OLED
Size
—
32"
Refresh
—
240Hz
Release year
—
2024

Gigabyte MO34WQC2

Pros
  • +34″ QD-OLED ultrawide at $749
  • +Dual-mode 1080p @ 350Hz
  • +Glossy panel reduces grayish tint
Cons
  • −No DisplayPort 2.1
  • −1800R curve not for everyone
  • −OSD joystick fiddly

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Pros
  • +Current panel tech
  • +Strong factory calibration
  • +Modern connectivity
Cons
  • −Stand footprint large on bigger sizes
  • −HDR varies by model
  • −OLED burn-in risk

FAQ: Gigabyte MO34WQC2 vs Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P

Which is better, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 or Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P? +

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P scores 92 on our weighted rubric — ahead by 2. Your best pick depends on the sub-scores above.

Is Gigabyte MO34WQC2 worth the price? +

At $749, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 delivers a Specdex score of 90 — strongest in display.

Is Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P worth the price? +

At $1,399, Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P delivers a Specdex score of 92 — strongest in motion.

Does Gigabyte MO34WQC2 or Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P last longer? +

Based on our long-term update and support ratings, both ship with multi-year support. Battery and reliability scores are visible in the breakdown above.

Which is better for picture quality, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 or Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P? +

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P — leads on hdr (92 vs 88). Color accuracy and HDR performance.

Which is the better value, Gigabyte MO34WQC2 or Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2P? +

Gigabyte MO34WQC2 — more score per dollar ($749 vs $1,399). Specdex score per dollar at MSRP.